Allotment of shares in lieu of interest liability as per BIFR scheme held as actual payment under section 43B

CIT v. Rathi Graphics Technologies Ltd [2015] 64 taxmann.com 65 (Delhi High Court)

Facts:

• The assessee had borrowed loan from IDBI and there was outstanding interest on such loan. A rehabilitation scheme was sanctioned by the BIFR, wherein it was decided that the IDBI would be allotted equity shares by the assessee and the interest to the extent of shares would be taken as having been paid.
• The assessee allotted certain shares to the IDBI and claimed that the said allotment of shares should be taken to be against the interest amount 'actually paid' within the meaning of section 43B.
• The assessment was completed accordingly. Thereafter, the Assessing Officer reopened the case of assessee on the ground that mere allotment of equity shares in lieu of interest liability could not be construed as 'actually paid' as required under section 43B.
• On appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) held that the reopening of the case was valid. However on merit, he deleted the addition. On second appeal, the Tribunal held that in the original assessment proceeding itself the Assessing Officer had raised a query on this issue which had been explained satisfactorily by the assessee and accepted by the Assessing Officer and, therefore, the instant case was a case of change of opinion. The Tribunal however upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) on merits.

The High Court held as under:

• This was indeed a case of mere change of opinion by the Assessing Officer. A specific query was raised by the Assessing Officer in the original assessment proceedings itself as regards the conversion of a portion of the interest into shares.
• When pursuant to a settlement the creditor agrees to convert a portion of interest into shares, it must be treated as an extinguishment of liability to pay interest to that extent. In essence, there will be no further outstanding interest to that extent. Consequently, the situation where an interest payable on a loan is converted into shares in the name of the lender/creditor is different from the situation envisaged in Explanation 3C to section 43B, viz., conversion of interest into 'a loan or borrowing'. In the latter instance, the liability continues, although in a different form. However, where the interest or a part thereof is converted into equity shares, the said interest amount for which the conversion is taking place is no longer a liability.
• The plea of the assessee, which was accepted by the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal that the said conversion of a portion of interest into shares should be taken to be 'actual payment' within the meaning of section 43B, merits acceptance. In that view of the matter, there is no legal infirmity in the impugned order of the Tribunal.

ITAT makes Section 43B disallowance even when assessee opts for presumptive taxation scheme

Non-payment of statutory liability before due date of filing of return would attract disallowance under Section 43B even if assessee had offered his income on presumptive basis.

Issue:

Whether disallowance of Section 43B could be made even when assessee opted for presumptive taxation Scheme?

The Tribunal held in favour of revenue as under:

• Under the presumptive taxation scheme, income of an assessee is computed at a fixed percentage of turnover and it would be deemed that that all deductions allowable under the head business or profession have already been allowed to assessee. In other words deductions allowable under Sections 28 to 43C are deemed to have been granted to assessee.
• Perusal of provisions of Section 43B shows that said provision is a restriction on allowance of particular expenditure, inter-alia, statutory liability, as it allows deduction of such liability on actual payment basis, i.e., expenditure shall not be allowed to be deducted unless same has been paid before the due date of filing the return.
• Section 44AF starts with the words “notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in Sec. 28 to 43C”, whereas section 43B starts with the words “notwithstanding anything contained in any other provisions of this Act”. 
• The non-obstante clause in Sec. 43B has a far wider amplitude because it uses the words “notwithstanding anything contained in any other provisions of this Act”. Therefore, even assuming that the deduction is permissible or the deduction is deemed to have been allowed under any other provisions of this Act, still the control placed by the provisions of Sec. 43B in respect of the statutory liabilities still holds precedence over such allowance.
• Hence, disallowance could be made by invoking the provisions of Sec. 43B in respect of the statutory liabilities, even though the assessee offered his income to tax on presumptive basis.

Note:

In the instant case, assessee has offered his income to tax on presumptive basis under Section 44AF. Provisions of Section 44AF are not applicable from assessment year beginning on or after the April 1, 2011. Thus, it can be inferred that the principal laid down by the ITAT would squarely apply when taxpayer has opted for presumptive taxation scheme under Section 44AD or Section 44AE.