ACIT V. SHABNAM SACHDEV (Delhi - Trib.)
Long-term advance booking of hotel
suite, which gave assessee perpetual right of possession and right to
transfer same, was capital asset
In the instant case, the assessee had
entered into an agreement with 'G' for long-term advance booking of a
suite in a hotel complex, permanently reserved for her use, till the
agreement subsisted. She had treated profit on sale of such right in the
suite as long term capital gain (‘LTCG’) after reducing indexed cost of
acquisition, which consisted of security deposit paid to 'G' and
maintenance charges paid to hotel. The AO noticed that the assessee had
claimed both the benefit of deduction under sec. 24(a) in previous year
as well as indexed cost of acquisition on maintenance expenses while
computing capital gains. He held that the long term advance booking was
not tenancy right and, hence, not a capital asset. Therefore, he treated
the profit on surrender of reservation of suite as income from other
sources, after deducting the amount of installments, but not the
maintenance charges. On appeal, the CIT (A) held that the sale
consideration received was taxable as long-term capital gain and
assessee was entitled to benefit of indexation. He, however, held that
assessee was not entitled to benefit of indexation on amount paid as
maintenance charges to hotel. Aggrieved by the order of CIT(A), assessee
filed the present appeal.
The Tribunal held in favour of assessee as under:
1) The assessee was
entitled to constant use of suite only in consideration of the agreement
and the security deposit. Further, the agreement contained covenants as
under:
- All government, Municipal and other taxes or levies in relation to the suite were to be paid by the assessee separately.
- Although the booking was in favour of the assessee, yet it could
occupy it itself or use the same for its family members or senior staff
and bona fide personal and business guests.
- The agreement/advance booking was transferable as and when desired by the assessee in writing.
All these
covenants made it abundantly clear that assessee had got right of
residence or possession in the suite by virtue of the agreement. This
right was transferable at the option of assessee. Thus, this right was
akin to the tenancy rights which are a valuable right in the property.
2)
Section 2(14) defines 'capital asset' as property of any kind held by
an assessee. The term 'property' encompasses in its ambit bundle of
rights. The right to dispose of a thing in every legal way, to possess
it and to use it to exclude everyone from interfering with it, comes
within the ambit of property. The exclusive right of possessing,
enjoying and disposing of a thing comes within the term of 'property'.
The assessee had perpetual right of possession of suite and was entitled
to transfer the same. Therefore, long-term advance booking, by virtue
of which assessee got right to possession, was 'capital asset' within
the definition of section 2(14) and, therefore, on transfer of the same,
LTCG had accrued to the assessee and assessee was, accordingly,
entitled to indexation of cost of acquisition. Thus, the department's
appeal was dismissed.