ACIT V.
ROBERT ARTHUR KELTZ (Delhi - Trib.)
In case of an assessee, being an
employee of a foreign company, only such proportion of ESOP is taxable
which relates to service rendered by such assessee in India
In
the instant case the assessee, an employee of foreign company, had
exercised ESOPs while on his assignment in India. He, therefore, offered
to tax the amount of proportionate ESOP earned in India, i.e.,
proportionate to the number of days of his assignment in India. However,
the AO while framing the
assessment brought to tax the entire amount of perquisite on account of
stock options. On appeal, the CIT (A) allowed assessee's appeal.
Aggrieved revenue filed the instant appeal.
The Tribunal held in favour of assessee as under:
- The principle laid down by the Delhi 'I' Bench in the case of Asstt. CIT v. Ellin 'D' Rozario [IT Appeal No. 2918 (Delhi) of 2005, dated 5-12-2008] was that only proportionate salary would be taxable in India, if a part of activity done by the assessee had no relation to any India-specific job or activity;
- In the instant case, it was not in dispute that the assessee was in India only for a short period and prior to it, he had not done any service connected with any activity in India;
- As the assessee had not rendered service in India for the whole grant period, applying the proposition laid down (supra), only such proportion of the ESOP would be taxable in India as related to the service rendered by the assessee in India.
No comments:
Post a Comment